michaelhocter.com - Latest Comments in Negative Scan vs. Print Scanhttp://michaelhocter.disqus.com/enSun, 29 Jul 2007 13:46:00 -0000Re: Negative Scan vs. Print Scanhttp://michaelhocter.com/index.php/2007/02/03/negative-scan-vs-print-scan/#comment-1518824The one on the right is more contrasty, harsher. It's hard to tell if there's more detail there. Aestetically, the image on the left is superior.LosslessSun, 29 Jul 2007 13:46:00 -0000Re: Negative Scan vs. Print Scanhttp://michaelhocter.com/index.php/2007/02/03/negative-scan-vs-print-scan/#comment-1518823Right ... better shadow detail.Joe KozlowskiSun, 11 Feb 2007 11:59:00 -0000Re: Negative Scan vs. Print Scanhttp://michaelhocter.com/index.php/2007/02/03/negative-scan-vs-print-scan/#comment-1518822Seriously though, the second shows more detail.BrianTue, 06 Feb 2007 11:07:00 -0000Re: Negative Scan vs. Print Scanhttp://michaelhocter.com/index.php/2007/02/03/negative-scan-vs-print-scan/#comment-1518821The one on the right is better. Better contrast. Better detail.ipse dixitSun, 04 Feb 2007 00:07:00 -0000Re: Negative Scan vs. Print Scanhttp://michaelhocter.com/index.php/2007/02/03/negative-scan-vs-print-scan/#comment-1518820Marty Feldman has no comment.BrianSat, 03 Feb 2007 22:25:00 -0000